[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More nits (was Re: reentrant variants of gethostbyname2/gethostbyaddr)
- To: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: More nits (was Re: reentrant variants of gethostbyname2/gethostbyaddr)
- From: "Ted Unangst" <ted_(_dot_)_unangst_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:11:59 -0800
On 3/6/06, Hannah Schroeter <hannah_(_at_)_schlund_(_dot_)_de> wrote:
> And I think <pthread.h> pollutes the global namespace in an unfortunate
> way, e.g.
> struct pthread;
are you really creating your own struct pthread type?
> Wouldn't it make sense to use "private" names for the opaque struct?
> struct __pthread;
> typedef struct __pthread *pthread_t;
> If that's accepted in general, I'd of course be ready to prepare a
it would probably be useful just to reinforce the idea that it's
private and one shouldn't try to use it.
Visit your host, monkey.org