[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org*Subject*: Re: small source code beautification*From*: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsdtech_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>*Date*: Mon, 16 May 2005 07:41:45 +0200*Mail-followup-to*: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org

yes, I fixed that efore I committed * Jacob Meuser <jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com> [2005-05-15 23:41]: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:10:07PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > Below you find the updated patch which should now be KNF-clean, with > > all the advice given heeded (hopefully). > > > @@ -343,11 +328,8 @@ > > } > > > > struct radix_node * > > -rn_insert(v_arg, head, dupentry, nodes) > > - void *v_arg; > > - struct radix_node_head *head; > > - int *dupentry; > > - struct radix_node nodes[2]; > > +rn_insert(void *v_arg, struct radix_node_head *head, > > + int *dupentry, struct radix_node nodes[2]) > > { > > caddr_t v = v_arg; > > struct radix_node *top = head->rnh_treetop; > > since style(9) is being discussed, shouldn't long statemets that need > two or more lines use a 4 space indent on the second and subsequent > lines? > > -- > <jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com> > -- BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/ OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ... Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)

**References**:**small source code beautification***From:*Toni Mueller

**Re: small source code beautification***From:*Zvezdan Petkovic

**Re: small source code beautification***From:*Toni Mueller

**Re: small source code beautification***From:*Simon Kellner

**Re: small source code beautification***From:*Toni Mueller

**Re: small source code beautification***From:*Jacob Meuser

- Prev by Date:
**Re: more improvements for mg** - Next by Date:
**Re: more improvements for mg** - Previous by thread:
**Re: small source code beautification** - Next by thread:
**Re: small source code beautification** - Index(es):