[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: any consideration to creating a default template rc.conf.local?
- To: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: any consideration to creating a default template rc.conf.local?
- From: Jason Sidabras <sidabraj_(_at_)_nsgcorp_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:23:49 -0500
the situation is basically the same for rc.conf.local and rc.local.
when you use those consistently, you can treat rc and rc.conf like
binaries on upgrades and simply overwrite them, which is good.
thus we either should not provide these files at all by default, or
no-op templates, where everything is commented out etc.
The real truth here is that if you provide a default rc.conf.local, it
will be necessary to let it source an hypothetical rc.conf.local.local
file, so that people can be sure that rc.conf.local can be upgraded
There were some things found on google but for this disscussion.
Maybe add the scripts to a faq or manpage?
Visit your host, monkey.org