Re: OT: Re: in-tree Lynx

[dreamwvr <dreamwvr_(_at_)_dreamwvr_(_dot_)_com>]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jeff Bachtel wrote:
> 
>  > links, last time I tried it (5 seconds ago) lacked such amneties as
>  > HTTP BASIC authentication.
> 
> that would have been something else, not the one i have ;)
> (0.96, and changelog says http auth support was merged in upstream
> march 2).
elinks might be the better choice since it offers text for text users
and graphics for X users. Sort of a drag to see lynx go. perhaps missing 
the point however what is wrong with a elinks port?

Best Regards,
dreamwvr_(_at_)_dreamwvr_(_dot_)_com