[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Patch packages?
- To: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Patch packages?
- From: William Yodlowsky <wyodlows_(_at_)_nj_(_dot_)_devry_(_dot_)_edu>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:26:13 -0400 (EDT)
As I upgraded several boxes to 2.7 I began to think about the patch
distribution process.
OK, before I go any further this is not intended to be flamebait. If I've
missed something obvious (and most times I do) then please do me the favor
of letting me know this in private :-)
The Patch Branch is cool. But if you're on a slow connection (or have a
slow machine) downloading and rebuilding the entire OS can be a
bit... much.
Then again applying the 20+ individual patches (for i386 for example) by
hand and rebuilding select parts of the OS isn't fun either, though more
manageable in my situation.
So what I was thinking is "patch packages"... you would use pkg_add to
install the patched binaries. That way you'd know what patches are
installed (via pkg_info) and it would definitely shorten the amount of
time it takes to do several boxes.
I realize a lot of patches are for the kernel. I'm not sure how that
should be handled... but that's why I'm throwing this out here :)
So, what have I overlooked? :-)
_____
,' ___ `. William Yodlowsky
| | | | wyodlows_(_at_)_nj_(_dot_)_devry_(_dot_)_edu
_'_|___|_`_ Security
| | First,
| | Last,
|_________| and
| OpenBSD | Always
`---------' http://www.openbsd.org/
Visit your host, monkey.org