[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: your mail
- To: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: your mail
- From: Dug Song <dugsong_(_at_)_monkey_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Bob Beck wrote:
> >it does require two keys, if you want to support both naming schemes.
> Why on earth would you want to do this for one host? it doesn't
> make any sense. Typically you would use one or the other.
typically, you would use the key named rcmd_(_dot_)_hostname_(_at_)_realm_(_dot_)_
but if you wanted to also support the proposed scheme using the FQDN of
the host, you'd have to add a key for that instance - or replace the old
one, at the expense of compatibility with existing krb4 implementations,
as was noted.