[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FIX: mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: FIX: mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0
- From: voegelas_(_at_)_gmx_(_dot_)_net (Andreas Vögele)
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:34:16 +0100
- Cancel-lock: sha1:q4djO7/mHTCNVxA9NgFn6M4/rzA=
Ben Lovett writes:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:52:31PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
>> do regression tests pass for you? one test is failing if i apply this
>> patch, it did not before.
> No, you're right. They don't pass. I'm not quite sure why the SPF
> stuff is even being evaluated though, since the plugin is not
> explicitly loaded in any of the configs. Not quite sure why this is.
> I'll try to look at it if I get a chance in the upcoming week or
> If anyone else has any ideas, I'm open to them.
The problem is my init.pre patch, which disables the SPF plugin since
Mail::SPF::Query isn't available in the ports tree.
Instead of a patch, `sed' could be used during post-install to copy a
modified version of init.pre to the fake installation directory. This
way the regression tests wouldn't be affected.
I'll send a new patch as soon as I've got a better connection to the
net, which will probably in two or three days.
BTW, I've got a port of Mail::SPF::Query, but I didn't want to add