Re: Update: mail/hashcash 1.20

[Armin Wolfermann <aw_(_at_)_osn_(_dot_)_de>]

* Jacob Meuser <jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com> [22.12.2005 12:06]:
> do you have a pointer to benchmarks with and without those options?

Running hashcash -sv takes a benchmark with all included cores. On my
P4 the improvement is 44 percent.

> in general, mmx code is allowed.  I'm not so sure about -mtune,
> though, except as a flavor.  I don't think it is an issue in this
> case though, since we already allow mmx, unless of course it exposes
> a gcc bug.

I checked the resulting binary on P4, P3, Athlon and ElanSC520. Maybe
someone can throw in some more i386 architectures.

Regards,
Armin Wolfermann