[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
proposed patch to mention WANTLIB in Makefile.template
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: proposed patch to mention WANTLIB in Makefile.template
- From: Moritz Grimm <mlist_(_at_)_scapa_(_dot_)_dnsalias_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:33:38 +0100
Hi,
the attached patch makes Makefile.template mention WANTLIB.
The place I used is below PERMIT_*, where most ports seem to put it.
I've also added a blank line between PERMIT_* and WANTLIB, something
that most ports don't do (mine included, I was following examples at the
time.) It doesn't make that much sense to me to have it tucked closely
to PERMIT_*, so I figured that new ports based on the template should
have it in a more prominent position.
Moritz
--- Makefile.template.orig Wed Nov 9 12:18:04 2005
+++ Makefile.template Wed Nov 9 12:23:10 2005
@@ -49,6 +49,11 @@
#PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM=Yes | "Reason if No"
#PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes | "Reason if No"
+# Libraries not mentioned below in LIB_DEPENDS but linked against by this
+# port, e.g. those in the base system or dependencies-of-dependencies, must
+# be registered in WANTLIB.
+#WANTLIB= ???
+
# where the source files and patches can be fetched
#
MASTER_SITES= ???
Visit your host, monkey.org