[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes
- From: Sebastian Rother <sebastian_(_dot_)_rother_(_at_)_jpberlin_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:26:21 +0100 (CET)
>> Perl and is still buggy. So if you wanna change something then
>> please take your time...!
>WHAT is buggy about it ? I haven't seen any recent bug-report.
>I'm not aware of issues with it.
1st: Please send a mail just to me if you've an Off-topic question
2nd: The answer:
perl /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date Collecting installed
packages Collecting port versions:
complete Collecting port signatures:
complete Outdated ports:
multimedia/streamdvd # libdvdread-0.9.4p1 ->
libdvdread-0.9.4p2 security/gpgme # gnupg-1.4.1p0 ->
gnupg-1.4.1p1 textproc/p5-XML-Parser # expat.4.0 -> expat.5.0
godfather $ pkg_info | grep gnupg
gnupg-1.4.1p1 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement
It's the same for all entries on the list "out-of-date" provides to me.
You see, the Script IS buggy and not trustworthly.
In fact you can't use these informations for scripts because nobody
knows if these informations are true or false.
And that's what I would call "buggy".
So if somebody thinks about improvements he/she should take some time.
And if you've other questions about my oppinion then please send me a