[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes
- From: Uwe Dippel <udippel_(_at_)_uniten_(_dot_)_edu_(_dot_)_my>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:34:21 +0800
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:04:15 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> Opinions ?
If you dared to be radical, you'd split the name into 3 parts:
generic name - human readable version - unix time.
That would read
python-expat: package name
2.3.5: for us humans to know the base version
1131013320: actual version to be used by pkg_foo
Irrespective of version numbers going up or down, the package tools will
only look at the unix time and update (including reverting to a lower
'human readable version') to a later (in unix time) version.
Of course, for us humans a patched version may as well read
or similar. No package tool would ever look at that p2; it is part of the
human readable version of the package identifier.
If tomorrow an older version is required, it could be put up as
With the unix time 86400 seconds more recent, pkg_add will update to this
version. With r1 being a *possible* indicator for going back in base
version to the human *only*.
Visit your host, monkey.org