[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NEW: www/elinks
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: NEW: www/elinks
- From: Aleksander Piotrowski <aleksander_(_dot_)_piotrowski_(_at_)_nic_(_dot_)_com_(_dot_)_pl>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 13:43:21 +0200
- Cc: James Prevatt <jprevatt+bsd_(_at_)_paunix_(_dot_)_org>
James Prevatt <jprevatt+bsd_(_at_)_paunix_(_dot_)_org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:04:35AM +0200, Aleksander Piotrowski wrote:
> > It looks like elinks is linking in its own static version of libintl:
> >
> > cc -O2 -pipe -g -Wall -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-strict-aliasing
> > -rdynamic -L/usr/X11R6/lib -o elinks [...] intl/libintl.a [...]
> > -lX11 -lssl -lcrypto -lz
>
> The elinks developers use their own modified version of gettext.
[...]
> However, it can use the system-installed version of iconv. So I can get
> rid of Extra: iconv.4 by making sure that the configure script can find
> the installed version.
No, let's use their version. They rely no their own changes, right?
> Extra: intl.2 is another story though. I can think of two options:
> 1. Let elinks use it's own implementation of gettext entirely (including
> iconv) and manually @comment out directories in PLIST that would be
> stripped if MODULES=devel/gettext were used, OR
> 2. Leave it as is and just know that Extra: intl.2 is going to be there
> because they are using their own and it's part of MODULES=devel/gettext
Maybe it's just enough to put devel/gettext as RUN_DEPENDS?
Alek
--
Ale to nie jest bomba, a głowa strzelca obracająca się wokół osi, wyrzucająca
z wnętrza różową spiralę płynu lśniącego jaskrawo w świetle słońca. Wirniki
trafiły go wprost w szyję. D.U. składa się teraz z dwóch osób: jedna z nich
obojętnie patrzy na głowę obracającą się w pyle, druga wrzeszczy ile sił w
płucach.
-- Neal Stephenson, Zamieć
Visit your host, monkey.org