[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UPDATE: www/mozilla-firefox 1.0.1
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: UPDATE: www/mozilla-firefox 1.0.1
- From: Marc Espie <espie_(_at_)_nerim_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:36:50 +0100
- Mail-followup-to: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: espie_(_at_)_nerim_(_dot_)_net
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:36:50PM +0059, Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:15:16PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > This is a straightforward update of www/mozilla-firefox to the
> > Firefox 1.0.1 release. I simply plugged in the new distfile.
> Version 1.0.1 has some severe stability regressions that were discovered
> just after the release (actually they were discovered before, but only on
> Version 1.0.2 will soon get released. So don't rush to upgrade to 1.0.1 yet.
I really don't understand how the various mozilla teams manage to release
shit so frequently.
Don't these guys have any kind of quality insurance ? don't they care
at all about their users ?
I've looked a bit at the mozilla code, most often I've run away in disgust.
I really don't understand why they still spend time adding more cool shit
to it when the basic framework is so totally flaky. Heck, even the user
interface is not that great, compared to some other not-so-hot, not
so-xml-buzzword compliant like konqueror.
Oh, and not surprisingly, the KDE beta are usually more stable than the
mozilla releases... We all now that some lizards may have a strong corporal
odor. Eating dead bodies will do that to you.
Visit your host, monkey.org