[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bad checksum for squid in 3.6, current?



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org 
> [mailto:owner-ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org] On Behalf Of Nick Bender
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 06:41 PM
> To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> Subject: bad checksum for squid in 3.6, current?
> 
> Running OPENBSD_3_6 and building squid I get:
> 
> >> Checksum mismatch for 
> squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch. (sha1)
> 
> I checked the distfile versus the downloaded patch file and 
> they are different.
> Also looked at HEAD, which has the same checksums as OPENBSD_3_6.
> 
> Anyone else see this or am I nuts?


All,

I just ran into this problem as well. It seems that
/usr/ports/www/squid/distinfo

Has the following hashes that identify
squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch as a valid patch :

MD5 (squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
ad7c46b18cb34dcf66b45e3cd8ba3f42
RMD160 (squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
8ad3c061cd2f18d627db3f73a260f1407b8e2d3b
SHA1 (squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
c853e84a671a8c8a6e304a1947be11d776685f34

While I get the following hashes for for
squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch downloaded from the website
(below):

MD5 (/usr/ports/distfiles/squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
6b17fda9d45dd638f5ce5ee230b9c091
SHA1 (/usr/ports/distfiles/squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
6319ab7ddb769576c1b27f2b6bf33e74af7b0e7f
RMD160 (/usr/ports/distfiles/squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
a6fb30a416e131720051f992568a3f56ad46cdc6

So the file hash is either wrong in distinfo or the file at
<http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fi
xes.patch> has been altered

For right now, I've just commented out the patch (the patch addresses a non
critical bug where a lot of warnings appear regarding cross compilation)


Sam Stern
Batlimore, MD, USA



Visit your host, monkey.org