[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bad checksum for squid in 3.6, current?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org 
> [mailto:owner-ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org] On Behalf Of Nick Bender
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 06:41 PM
> To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> Subject: bad checksum for squid in 3.6, current?
> Running OPENBSD_3_6 and building squid I get:
> >> Checksum mismatch for 
> squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch. (sha1)
> I checked the distfile versus the downloaded patch file and 
> they are different.
> Also looked at HEAD, which has the same checksums as OPENBSD_3_6.
> Anyone else see this or am I nuts?


I just ran into this problem as well. It seems that

Has the following hashes that identify
squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch as a valid patch :

MD5 (squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
RMD160 (squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
SHA1 (squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =

While I get the following hashes for for
squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch downloaded from the website

MD5 (/usr/ports/distfiles/squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
SHA1 (/usr/ports/distfiles/squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =
RMD160 (/usr/ports/distfiles/squid/squid-2.5.STABLE8-format_fixes.patch) =

So the file hash is either wrong in distinfo or the file at
xes.patch> has been altered

For right now, I've just commented out the patch (the patch addresses a non
critical bug where a lot of warnings appear regarding cross compilation)

Sam Stern
Batlimore, MD, USA

Visit your host, monkey.org