Re: modules, PLIST and PFRAG.shared

[Jolan Luff <jolan_(_at_)_protection_(_dot_)_cx>]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:44:53PM -0701, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> Now that files ending in .so are put into PFRAG.shared by
> update-plist, should this be done wherever possible?  For example,
> in multimedia/libquicktime, there are several modules that end in
> .so, and update-plist wants to move them to PFRAG.shared, however,
> the port is also marked NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS, since there's
> no way to build libquicktime without the modules.  I thought the
> reason for a separate PFRAG.shared was so that the files in that
> list didn't get put into the PLIST on NO_SHARED_ARCHS.
> 
> So for ports that set NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS, should .so
> files be put into PFRAG.shared, or should update-plist be patched
> to not move .so files to PFRAG.shared?

Put them in PFRAG.shared regardless of NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS.