[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: modules, PLIST and PFRAG.shared
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: modules, PLIST and PFRAG.shared
- From: Jolan Luff <jolan_(_at_)_protection_(_dot_)_cx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:03:01 -0500
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:44:53PM -0701, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> Now that files ending in .so are put into PFRAG.shared by
> update-plist, should this be done wherever possible? For example,
> in multimedia/libquicktime, there are several modules that end in
> .so, and update-plist wants to move them to PFRAG.shared, however,
> the port is also marked NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS, since there's
> no way to build libquicktime without the modules. I thought the
> reason for a separate PFRAG.shared was so that the files in that
> list didn't get put into the PLIST on NO_SHARED_ARCHS.
> So for ports that set NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS, should .so
> files be put into PFRAG.shared, or should update-plist be patched
> to not move .so files to PFRAG.shared?
Put them in PFRAG.shared regardless of NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS.
Visit your host, monkey.org