[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NEW: auctex
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: NEW: auctex
- From: Nikolay Sturm <sturm_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:05:04 +0100
- Mail-followup-to: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Organization: Fnord!
* rich cannings [2004-02-04]:
> AUC TeX is an "extensible emacs interface for TeX".
At least from the point of view of an xemacs user this port doesn't make
sense. Xemacs has its own package system, that doesn't interfere with
our policies AFAIK and is dead simple to use. Furthermore, there is the
xemacs-sumo port (which is really out-of-date). What is the situation in
gnu emacs land? Do they have a package system, too?