[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Setiqueue port

To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: Setiqueue port
From: naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:45:37 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: list.openbsd.ports

Philihp Busby <philihp_(_at_)_philihp_(_dot_)_com> wrote:

> Is there a unix alternative to Setiqueue?

I'm not aware of one.

I use the {Fetch,Run}Cache scripts that are referenced on the
SETI_(_at_)_home add-ons page, but these are crude and don't scale since
they maintain a separate cache on each client host.

> Or a way to run it on OpenBSD without Wine?

Does our Wine port even work?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Setiqueue port
  - From: Lars Hansson

Prev by Date: Re: Where's the right place to document sysctl's for ogle?
Next by Date: Can't install any more ports
Previous by thread: Re: Where's the right place to document sysctl's for ogle?
Next by thread: Re: Setiqueue port
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org