[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: update: enigma
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: update: enigma
- From: Han Boetes <han_(_at_)_mijncomputer_(_dot_)_nl>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:58:59 +0100
- Mail-followup-to: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Christian Weisgerber (naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de) wrote:
> We don't care for CPPFLAGS. The relevant variables are
> | compiler | flags
> C | CC | CFLAGS
> C++ | CXX | CXXFLAGS
> Respecting these is important. It allows users to build ports with
> their choice of compiler and optimization (and stack-smashing
> protection if you think of propolice) and it allows us to test stuff.
If I would like to keep in mind that I could send patches to the authors
of the software so they can take these simple wishes in account what
should the patches look like.
In the Makefile.in I mostly see something like : CC= @CC@ which is not a
problem, just that the configure script doesn't take CC in account.
But lots of configure files are now generated with automake. So what
would be the best way to solve this situation?