[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Adding a standard regress target?

To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: Adding a standard regress target?
From: naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 20:19:34 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: list.openbsd.ports

Marc Espie <Marc_(_dot_)_Espie_(_at_)_liafa_(_dot_)_jussieu_(_dot_)_fr> wrote:

> In fact, a simple regression harness is trivial:

Yes!  That's exactly what I had in mind.

Hmm.  REGRESS_{ENV,FLAGS}?  (See archivers/bzip2.)

> +NO_REGRESS?= No

But that is wrong for most ports.  Should we sprinkle a thousand
NO_REGRESS=Yes over the tree?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de

References:
- Adding a standard regress target?
  - From: Christian Weisgerber

Prev by Date: Re: new port : golem window manager
Next by Date: Re: new port : golem window manager
Previous by thread: Re: Adding a standard regress target?
Next by thread: Pb with libpng and ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org