[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ports tracking current
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: ports tracking current
- From: Jeff Bachtel <jeff_(_at_)_cepheid_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:20:56 -0500
Any reason not to just tag it with OPENBSD_2_9 (the -stable tag) ?
Assuming that is not desired, then whatever tag name is picked doesn't
As one of the whiners, thanks :)
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 08:50:09AM -0400, Dan Weeks wrote:
> > What would this tag be for? Just noting the switch or if you want to
> > update a 2.9-stable system you would use it? I guess maybe both?
> Experience. Routine complains from whiners who want to have their cakes
> and eat it too. This is a clear way to tell them to stop updating their
> ports tree, and also being nice to them, since they can unhose their
> machine by reverting to the last `correct' experimental ports tree that
> works on src-stable.
Jeff Bachtel (root_(_at_)_ISC,TAMU) http://www.cepheid.org/~jeff
[finger jeff_(_at_)_cepheid_(_dot_)_org for PGP key]