[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New i386 package snapshot
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: New i386 package snapshot
- From: naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de (Christian Weisgerber)
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
- Newsgroups: list.openbsd.ports
Sebastian Stark <seb_(_at_)_todesplanet_(_dot_)_de> wrote:
> > > graphics/py-Imaging,1.5 python threading conflict seb_(_at_)_todesplanet_(_dot_)_de
> > > graphics/py-Imaging,2.1 python threading conflict seb_(_at_)_todesplanet_(_dot_)_de
> > Handling this is beyond our current package building framework.
> Should we use IS_INTERACTIVE instead?
If you use a different build order, or build just the right subset,
those ports are fine as is. (Assuming there are no other problems.)
Currently, if you do a full packages build with the default build
order, python-*-threads is installed. cooledit needs python without
threads, and py-Imaging needs python with Tk.
One idea would be a build scheme where the dependencies are removed
again after a package has been built. I'm not sure how much relative
overhead that would create now that we have BIN_PACKAGES.
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de