[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: net/samba-2.2.0

To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: net/samba-2.2.0
From: naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:45:44 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: list.openbsd.ports

Todd T. Fries <todd_(_at_)_fries_(_dot_)_net> wrote:

> Is there any sense in having FLAVOR's manage two different versions of a
> package?

No.
editors/vim and mail/postfix are examples of how to handle this,
i.e. provide a stable and a snapshot port.  I suggest not to go
overboard with this, though.  We don't want every port to bifork
like this.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy_(_at_)_mips_(_dot_)_inka_(_dot_)_de

References:
- net/samba-2.2.0
  - From: Daniel Hartmeier

Prev by Date: New port: mail/qtools
Next by Date: Re: New port: mail/qtools
Previous by thread: net/samba-2.2.0
Next by thread: Re: net/samba-2.2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org