[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
useless statistics on the current ports tree
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: useless statistics on the current ports tree
- From: Marc Espie <espie_(_at_)_schutzenberger_(_dot_)_liafa_(_dot_)_jussieu_(_dot_)_fr>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:38:29 +0100
- Mail-followup-to: Marc Espie <espie_(_at_)_schutzenberger_(_dot_)_liafa_(_dot_)_jussieu_(_dot_)_fr>, ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: Marc_(_dot_)_Espie_(_at_)_liafa_(_dot_)_jussieu_(_dot_)_fr
A build against a -stable machine gives the following results.
Marked as broken:
kaffe-1.0.5 (problem with the new gmp)
bochs-2000_0325a-debug (missing protos, deadly for C++)
imagemagick-5.2.9 (as usual, distfile changed)
gphoto-0.4.3 (depending on imagemagick)
xfmail-1.4.6 (bad checksum)
uvscan_dat (missing distfile)
wwwcount-2.5 (still, bad checksum)
gtl-1.0 (fetching source has restrictions)
cassowary-0.60 (depending on gtl-1.0)
Unfaked ports (hence not built):
wine-990225 (antique, anyway)
There were a few more errors which turned out to be trivial to fix.
Most of these problems are transient. However it would be VERY cool
if the following ports could finally get fixed (yes, I consider non-faked
ports to be a bug, more often than not):
lyx-1.0.0 (note that lyx is positively ancient).
as these HAVE had problems basically *forever*.
Now for the statistics. I end up with 1090 packages being built, out
of which 1039 are suitable for ftp.
The ftp-able packages take up 553MB, roughly. This would still fit on a
single CD, we still have 100MB to go.
On the other hand, the distfiles no longer fit on a CD: total is 943MB.
A full ports build tree for a 386 (with packages, distfiles, and
working directories) roughly takes 9.5GB.
Visit your host, monkey.org