[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some current problems of the ports tree
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Some current problems of the ports tree
- From: Marc Espie <Marc_(_dot_)_Espie_(_at_)_liafa_(_dot_)_jussieu_(_dot_)_fr>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:39:55 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 09:02:54AM -0400, Brad wrote:
> > In the bsd.mork.mk (v 1.327), the use of the variables: HAS_CONFIGURE,
> > CONFIGURE_ENV, CONFIGURE_ARGS are all depreciated. What is the
> > recommended method of configuring a program?
> no, USE_AUTOCONF, USE_IMAKE, HAS_CONFIGURE and GNU_CONFIGURE are deprecated.
> CONFIGURE_ARGS and CONFIGURE_ENV are still being used.
> > If these (and other) variables are truly depreciated, should someone
> > update ports/infrastructure/templates/Makefile.template?
> definately needs some tweaking.
One known issue of the ports documentation is that it exists in several
I've now relocated a large proportion of the ports documentation to
I hope to be able to remove a fair number of comments from bsd.port.mk
in the near future. Specifically, the comments there should exist to
explain tricky stuff that is going on, and the comments that are currently
there are going to bsd.port.mk(5).
|anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics...
|AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript...
| `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta'