[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch validation



--- mdcalvi_(_at_)_cox_(_dot_)_net wrote:

> yea. i'll keep that in mind.  too bad it doesnt work
> in an audit.  
> 
> seriously,  is there anything that 
> a) can be queried against?
> b) compared against?
> c) hashs of files?
> d) etc?
> 
> is it something others have concerns about?
> M
> ---- Ioan Nemes <inemes_(_at_)_fairfieldcity_(_dot_)_nsw_(_dot_)_gov_(_dot_)_au>
> wrote: 
> > >>> "Nick Guenther" <kousue_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com> 03/05/2006
> 09:07:35 am >>>
> > On 5/2/06, mdcalvi_(_at_)_cox_(_dot_)_net <mdcalvi_(_at_)_cox_(_dot_)_net>
> wrote:
> > > I  brought up a 3.9 server and have patched it
> with the sendmail
> > patch.  My question is how does one prove that the
> box has been patched
> > in 2,3 or 4 months?

Are you looking for a patch administration
command sort of like Solaris's pkgparam or
patchadd? I could be wrong, but I don't think
OBSD has anything like that.

Sorry I could not be more helpful.
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Visit your host, monkey.org