Re: Odd "df" reporting (On Apr 3 snapshot, data copied via 3.8snapshot)

[Whyzzi <whyzzi_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>]

Cool! That seems to have done the trick (April 20, 2006 snapshot):

(I)nstall, (U)pgrade, or (S)hell? s
# fsck -b32 -f /dev/rwd0d
Alternate Superblock Location: 32
** /dev/rwd0d
** File system is already clean
** Last mounted on
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD
SALVAGE? [Fyn] y

FREE BLK COUNT(S) IN WRONG SUPERBLK
SALVAGE? [Fyn] y

9406 files, 8177199 used, 22783126 free (1086 frags, 2847755 blocks,
0.0% fragmentation)

UPDATE STANDARD SUPERBLK? [Fyn?] y

***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
#

Thanks, error message cleared!
-Whyzzi

On 14/04/06, Pedro Martelletto <pedro_(_at_)_ambientworks_(_dot_)_net> wrote:
> Yes, it has a built-in fsck.
>
> But you will need to update your kernel too.
>
> -p.