[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenBSD 3.9 stable from cvs
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: OpenBSD 3.9 stable from cvs
- From: Nick Holland <nick_(_at_)_hc_(_dot_)_holland-consulting_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:39:17 -0400
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> On 4/14/06, Nick Holland <nick_(_at_)_holland-consulting_(_dot_)_net> wrote:
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c
> > OPENBSD_3_9_BASE is tagged...and that's it. (well..usually. I'm sure
> > there's some exception somewhere...)
> > The patches were put into OPENBSD_3_9 (a.k.a., stable), it turns out.
> > That's not at all usual, and rather surprised me. Apparently, this is a
> > Special Case.
> No. All patches past the _BASE tag always go into -STABLE. In this
> case, correctly into OPENBSD_3_9. This is not special AFAIK.
HELLO... Topic is WHEN they go in.
3.9 is not official yet. This patch set went into -stable already.
That *is* unusual.