Re: OpenBSD 3.9 stable from cvs

[Nick Holland <nick_(_at_)_hc_(_dot_)_holland-consulting_(_dot_)_net>]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> On 4/14/06, Nick Holland <nick_(_at_)_holland-consulting_(_dot_)_net> wrote:
> 
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c
> >
> > OPENBSD_3_9_BASE is tagged...and that's it.  (well..usually.  I'm sure
> > there's some exception somewhere...)
> >
> > The patches were put into OPENBSD_3_9 (a.k.a., stable), it turns out.
> > That's not at all usual, and rather surprised me.  Apparently, this is a
> > Special Case.
> 
> No. All patches past the _BASE tag always go into -STABLE. In this
> case, correctly into OPENBSD_3_9. This is not special AFAIK.
 
*sigh*
HELLO...  Topic is WHEN they go in.
3.9 is not official yet.  This patch set went into -stable already.
That *is* unusual.

Nick.