[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UDF - where are we ?



On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:23:43 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:

> but did it not mount the disc?

njet. zero.

> that's from sys/isofs/udf/udf_vfsops.c, and actually it's udf_mount:...
> 
> that's not a message from a fatal error, it's just "informative".

I *did* understand this. It was added for completeness of this report.
No, my -t udf didn't mount it. The default mounts it properly, except for
large files. It looks exactly like in that cited google post; like jumping
to negative numbers at an integer overflow. I could live with the wrong
size indication, but the content also is screwed. Anything below 2 GB is
perfect.
Have you tried with a large file ? I have been using it successfully,
only yesterday I wanted to burn some 'dump'-images to DVD when the
mess showed at my control mounts after burning. And I expected growisofs
initially.

Uwe



Visit your host, monkey.org