[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PF performance question



From: Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna [mailto:ds_(_at_)_hacked_(_dot_)_com_(_dot_)_br]
> The ifconfig and brconfig output is as follow:
> I have setup an IP adress on the networks so i can access the machine
> remotely and the rl0 is disabled.
> 
> $ ifconfig -a
> em0: 
> flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         address: 00:30:48:72:95:1a
>         media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
>         status: active
>         inet 200.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 
> 200.xxx.xxx.127
>         inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe72:951a%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> em1: 
> flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         address: 00:30:48:72:95:1b
>         media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
>         status: active
>         inet 10.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 
> 10.xxx.xxx.255
>         inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe72:951b%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2

Looks like these interfaces are forced to 100/full. Have you also forced the
other end of the link (hub, switch, whatever), or are they still
autonegotiating? Depending on the configuraiton of the other end, it could
try to autonegotiate and end up with a duplex mismatch.

DS