[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: raid kernel



* Nick Holland <nick_(_at_)_holland-consulting_(_dot_)_net> [050825 07:22]:
> Edd Barrett wrote:
> >> rather then trying more stupid band-aids and wuergarounds it would be
> >> fantastic if someone could sit down and get us a software raid
> >> implementation that doesn't suck and thus can be included in the regular
> >> kernels.
> > 
> > I havent noticed anything terribly wrong with raidframe. Why do you
> > think it sucks?
> > 
> > The only drawback with raidframe i see is that mirrors can only be 2 disks.
> 
> * huge
> * complex
> * you can't add mirroring after initial install if you weren't planning
> for it at the beginning.
> * its recovery from "events" is not graceful (i.e., long boot times).
> 
> That's just a starter...
> 
> (can't believe I forgot the bsd.mp case...)
> 
> Nick.
> 

Just curious, what does the dev team think about Vinum?

Jim