[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Burn Testing

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: Burn Testing
From: Gaby vanhegan <gaby_(_at_)_vanhegan_(_dot_)_net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:09:21 +0100

On 26 May 2005, at 18:27, Oliver J. Morais wrote:

* Gaby vanhegan <gaby_(_at_)_vanhegan_(_dot_)_net> [050526 17:31]:
Ouch ;-) for x in `jot 24 1` is better I think ;-)
I tried to use seq, but it wasn't there.  Quick to write the numbers
than search the man page...
/usr/ports/misc/sh-utils if you want (g)seq, but jot is fine.

So, why is there no seq in OpenBSD? I can see that jot fills the gap nicely, and I presume it takes the functionality of some other old gnu apps also?

--
Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998!
gaby_(_at_)_vanhegan_(_dot_)_net
http://weblog.vanhegan.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: hellsop

References:
- Burn Testing
  - From: Gaby vanhegan
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: Gaby vanhegan
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: Sean Brown
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: Gaby vanhegan
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: Oliver J. Morais
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: Gaby vanhegan
- Re: Burn Testing
  - From: Oliver J. Morais

Prev by Date: Re: Burn Testing
Next by Date: Re: Burn Testing
Previous by thread: Re: Burn Testing
Next by thread: Re: Burn Testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org