[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Atheros chipset support
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Atheros chipset support
- From: Johan Torin <jtorin_(_at_)_myrealbox_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:07:36 +0100
On Monday 07 February 2005 09:21, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 06:51:18PM -0600, J Moore wrote:
> > I've seen postings suggesting that atheros support is available only in
> > -current, but I didn't see any of the chipsets listed above as being
> > supported. Bottom line: is this miniPCI card supported, which release,
> > and if "none" any guesses as to when (if ever)?
> There is some atheros support in -current but only for the older chipsets,
> a/b/g ones are not yet supported but may be in the hopefully not too
> distant future.
Well, since I also is hunting for a good, fast, wireless NIC (for PCI),
I'm interested in this subject too.
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html doesn't mention ath anywhere, blue
asterix (*) or not. Not fully implemented? I don't think it would
would had been merged into the tree in that case... I would think
that a major development like that should be better advertised?
At the same time, the man-page  in -current for ath doesn't mention
anywhere that the support is experimental or anything overly negative.
However (and this is my point for replying to Jonathan), it does state:
AR5212-based devices support 802.11a, 802.11b, and 802.11g
operation with transmit speeds appropriate to each.
and the man-page also lists 17 cards capable of a/b/g operation, which
of four is PCI cards (and I'm looking at buying a Netgear WAG311).
I would very much like an clarification in this matter since
something/someone is in error. If it's me... I apologise.
(It's perhaps no surprise that Jay's card doesn't work - it
doesn't have a clearly supported chipset.)
 man page for ath