[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC and Co. removal

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: RFC and Co. removal
From: Jason McIntyre <jasonmcintyre_(_at_)_f2s_(_dot_)_com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:01:40 +0001
Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:24:29PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> 
> So I can understand removing RFC-derived bits from manpages very
> well. But I can understand less that we don't redistribute RFCs as
> is, e.g. as complement to the documentation of components implementing
> them (isakmpd or so), i.e. in places where it just doesn't hurt that
> modification is prohibited.
> 

i'm not sure why obsd would want to distribute RFCs. they're available
online if you want them.

jmc

References:
- RFC and Co. removal
  - From: Alexey E. Suslikov

Prev by Date: carp(4) working beyond expectations, why? (long email)
Next by Date: Re: The state of Java on OpenBSD
Previous by thread: Re: RFC and Co. removal
Next by thread: usb-to-serial connection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org