[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setting runlevel to single-user
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: setting runlevel to single-user
- From: Ben Goren <ben_(_at_)_trumpetpower_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:02:56 -0700
On 2004 Oct 29, at 5:23 AM, Brett Lymn wrote:
>> Please describe one of these uber-complex systems with lots
>> of complex startup scripts and interdependencies that can't be handled
>> by a simple rc script and rc.conf.
> Sure thing. Ever had to manage a machine that is used to run Oracle
Ah--I thought you might have one of those behemoths in mind.
So, permit me to say: if you're running Oracle on OpenBSD, you're nuts.
Wacko. Whistlin' Dixie with the Leprechauns.
(Okay, if you're trying out their ``free'' download version on a test
box, that's something different, but hardly relevant or important.)
Why? You're running Oracle for one or both of two reasons. The best
reason is that you've got a problem that only Oracle can solve. The
most common reason is that Oracle is the big, impressive name.
In the first case, the only reason to *not* run Oracle on a dedicated
system running an officially-approved-by-Oracle configuration (and, it
should go without saying, OpenBSD is *NOT* one of those) is if you know
more about Oracle than the Oracle support staff and need to solve a
problem that one of their standard setups can't handle. It happens, I'm
sure, but ya ain't gonna read about it on misc_(_at_)__(_dot_)_
In the second case, you paid all that money to Oracle largely for their
support. So you want to run Oracle on a nice, officially-supported
platform to get the most bang for your buck. The same PHB who paid for
Oracle in the first place because it's a big, impressive name ain't
never heard of OpenBSD and certainly won't authorize tainting their
precious Oracle anything so unorthodox as OpenBSD.
This holds true for all those other big-money poorly-designed
leviathans that suffer from similar problems. You're not going to be
running them on OpenBSD. If you're running them on a free operating
system, it'll either be one of the commercial Linux distributions or
*maybe* FreeBSD. If you *are* running it on OpenBSD, you sure don't
need help 'round here. In any event, you're certainly running it on a
dedicated machine, carefully crafted down to the power supply.
In that environment, OpenBSD's boot style isn't even on your radar. If
you *are* using OpenBSD, you've modified so much else that writing your
own init code is little more than an afterthought.
So...why should we make OpenBSD overly complex in order to deal with
poorly-designed, expensive, non-free applications that nobody'll ever
run on OpenBSD anyway?
[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of PGP.sig]