[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS question
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org, "STeve Andre'" <andres_(_at_)_msu_(_dot_)_edu>
- Subject: Re: CVS question
- From: John Kerbawy <kerbawy_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:07:54 -0400
- Reply-to: john_(_at_)_maKintosh_(_dot_)_com
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:56:01 +0000, STeve Andre' <andres_(_at_)_msu_(_dot_)_edu> wrote:
> If I'm updating my tree, and I know that only /etc/rc needs updating,
> am I safe to ^C the update after I see that the files in question have
> been updated? From what I've read of cvs I think so, but I find it a
> cumbersome beast.
It's safe, sure, but it's cleaner to cd /usr/src/etc && cvs update rc.
The difference between theory and practice
is that in theory there is no difference,
but in practice there is.