[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ntp and cisco
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: ntp and cisco
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg_(_at_)_66h_(_dot_)_42h_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:43:19 +0000 (UTC)
Csillag Tamas <cstamas <at> digitus.itk.ppke.hu> writes:
> Now cisco is syncing with the OpenBSD box, however I think the clock
> becames less accurate look:
While I think too that clockspeed is a nice thing,
50 ms accuracy is well within what an IBM compatible
personal computer with a non-realtime operating system
can achieve.
If you believe a PC would ever get more accuracy,
for example ten milliseconds, you've been tricked.
> 2004-10-13_11:19:01.37037 reply from 131.188.3.220: \
> offset 0.051742 delay 0.0589
> 69, next query 289s
Look, 50 ms should be fairly enough.
> So if one knows how to trick the cisco to believe
> this is an 'authoritive' ntp server please tell me.
You might consider asking Henning to put a
new keyword 'standalone' into /etc/ntpd.conf,
specially for configurations e.g. with no
internet access, or a different means of being
synched (taiclock, *hint hint*). I vote for it.
//mirabile
Visit your host, monkey.org