[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make release error (undefined reference) on OPENBSD_3_6 and OPENBSD_3_6_BASE
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: make release error (undefined reference) on OPENBSD_3_6 and OPENBSD_3_6_BASE
- From: Markus Kolb <usenet-092004_(_at_)_tower-net_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:52:09 +0200
On 07.10.2004 22:54, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote:
On 07.10.2004 20:50, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
This smells like some non-standard compile flags.
Oh yeah. Great.
I forgot the "+" in
Is there any good reason for using such optimizations?
IOW: are the performance/size benefits worth the potential trouble?
I have no comparison. I have to compile it and I compile it for my
architecture. Never got any trouble with those architecture flag.
Up-to-date versions of GCC generates 486 code by default.
Visit your host, monkey.org