[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rdr load-balancing: NAT or nat?

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: rdr load-balancing: NAT or nat?
From: kami petersen <kokamomi_(_at_)_gueststars_(_dot_)_net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:24:15 +0200

Xavier wrote:

Ex: the obsd/fx (192.168.0.1) must load-balance HTTP to


you mean:

Ex: the obsd/fx (192.168.2.1) must load-balance HTTP to

I use:
www_servers = "{192.168.2.80, 192.168.2.81 }"
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 192.168.2.1 port 80 -> $www_servers round-robin sticky-address

I always get a "Connection refused" when accessing 192.168.2.1:80


is 192.168.2.1 really your $ext_if?

References:
- rdr load-balancing: NAT or nat?
  - From: Xavier

Prev by Date: FIXED! Connection pool oddities and PF - a solution.
Next by Date: /etc/crontab
Previous by thread: rdr load-balancing: NAT or nat?
Next by thread: Re: rdr load-balancing: NAT or nat?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org