[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Theo de Raadt talks software security
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Theo de Raadt talks software security
- From: "Edward A. Gardner" <eag_(_at_)_ophidian_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:57:59 -0600
From OpenBSD-advocacy:
At 08:00 16-09-2004, you wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1498222899;fp;16;fpid;0>
--
Dave Feustel 260-422-5330
From the referenced article:
For example, [Microsoft's] entire NX effort, the reliance on AMD64 PAE NX,
is a mockery of what is possible because it is only protecting some parts
of the address space so buffer overflows are still possible.
Anyone know where to find a technical [non-marketing] description of what
M$ is / is not doing with NX support? On second thought, maybe the
insistence on non-marketing is expecting too much :-).
Edward A. Gardner eag at ophidian dot com
Ophidian Designs 719 593-8866 voice
1262 Hofstead Terrace 719 210-7200 cell
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
Visit your host, monkey.org