[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LPR Question
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: LPR Question
- From: Juha Saarinen <juhasaarinen_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:32:36 +1200
- Reply-to: Juha Saarinen <juhasaarinen_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:19:23 -0700, Jacob Meuser <jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com> wrote:
So that's how it's done in FreeBSD.
> "seems to"? maybe it does but there is yet another (large part of )
> ghostscript installed under another name that you apparently don't
> know about. or maybe the GNU ghostscript is patched. regardless,
> pstoraster has to come from somewhere. the recommended (by CUPS
> documentation) way is to use ESP ghostscript.
The FreeBSD port installs cups-pstoraster as well.
cups-188.8.131.52 The Common UNIX Printing System: Metaport to install comple
cups-base-184.108.40.206 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & daemons
cups-lpr-220.127.116.11 The CUPS BSD and system V compatibility binaries (lp* comma
cups-pstoraster-7.07_1 GNU Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to
Like I said, it works for me, but if it gets your butt fur in a knot,
stay away from it.