[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: After 'cvs up' ... what next?
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: After 'cvs up' ... what next?
- From: Ben Goren <ben_(_at_)_trumpetpower_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:01:11 -0700
On 2004 Aug 11, at 8:31 AM, Greg Thomas wrote:
>> (In his first post, he mentioned following the OPENBSD_3_5 branch.)
> Sorry. Then I should have said keep up to date via CVS and follow the
> instructions on errata.html.
Erm...no. At least, not if you said what I think you said.
If you're keeping up to date with CVS, then you follow release(8).
If you're keeping up to date with patches (/errata.html), then you
follow the instructions in the patches (or you do a release(8)).
Don't mix the two. Either do all CVS and always do a ``make build'' or
do all patches (in which case you can either apply them individually or
do a full ``make build,'' whichever you're in the mood for at the
Me? I just build a release. Sure, it's hard on the CPU, but what do I
care? It's easy on me. There's darn little to actually do and I get to
sleep better at night.
[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of PGP.sig]