[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Real-world scenario for passive OS fingerprinting
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Real-world scenario for passive OS fingerprinting
- From: Tim Hammerquist <tim+openbsd-misc_(_at_)_vegeta_(_dot_)_ath_(_dot_)_cx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:23:43 -0700
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: tim_(_at_)_vegeta_(_dot_)_ath_(_dot_)_cx
Squigly wrote:
> I've been using openbsd for quite some time, nothing fancy. I've done
> some reading about passive OS fingerprinting, and played abit with
> p0f.
> [...]
> My question is, does anyone has a real-world scenario in which this
> feature might come handy?
My favorite so far has come from Randal. See
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc/2004-01/0459.html
It doesn't block access to Windows machines, but it does ensure that
worms will never unnecessarily suck your bandwidth.
CYA is a perfectly valid reason to fingerprint (and even drop)
a connecting machine.
HTH,
Tim Hammerquist
Visit your host, monkey.org