[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pfsync and tables
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: pfsync and tables
- From: Jeff Wilson <wilsonj_(_at_)_cs_(_dot_)_ecs_(_dot_)_baylor_(_dot_)_edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:29:55 -0500 (CDT)
- Reply-to: wilsonj_(_at_)_cs_(_dot_)_ecs_(_dot_)_baylor_(_dot_)_edu
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Jeff Wilson wrote:
> To the pfsync gurus,
> ... <snip> ...
> How would you keep state for dynamically added/deleted rules across
> redundant firewalls? I have verified that a static rule's state syncs
> just fine across pfsync0, but the table stuff doesn't. Any suggestions?
Sorry for the re-post, but I wanted to shorten it to get to my main point:
I have a ruleset involving dynamic rules. What is the best method
(anchors, tables, "other") to get those dynamic rules pfsync'd across my
two firewalls? Right now, we're using tables, but that's not (yet)
supported by pfsync. Any ideas?
Thanks for your time,
Visit your host, monkey.org