[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: adding Soekris 4801 to supported architectures
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: adding Soekris 4801 to supported architectures
- From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:59:22 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
* Cedric Berger <cedric_(_at_)_berger_(_dot_)_to> [2004-06-02 11:44]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >* Greg Thomas <getbsd_(_at_)_dslextreme_(_dot_)_com> [2004-06-02 10:49]:
> >>On Jun 1, 2004, at 7:47 PM, J Moore wrote:
> >>>On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:22:54AM +0200, the unit calling itself
> >>>Christian Gut wrote:
> >>>>>Any possibility that Soekris might be added to the list of supported
> >>>>>architectures anytime in the near future?
> >>>>already is. look for i386.
> >>>Your response implies that one can simply take the i386 distribution,
> >>>pack it on a CF card, and go to town. Is that what you mean?
> >>It means that one can compile an i386 kernel which will run on the
> >no wrong, GENERIC works just fine.
> on *4501*, GENERIC does not work fine on soekris
> because for some reason, soekris use a different clock
> than regular PC, so with generic you get a drift of a couple
> minutes every couple hour or so with GENERIC.
> Don't know yet what the situation is on 4801.
http://2suck.net/hhwl.html - http://www.bsws.de/
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
Visit your host, monkey.org