[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pf firewall loses connectivity at 50,000 state table entries (thread separated)

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: pf firewall loses connectivity at 50,000 state table entries (thread separated)
From: Chris Zakelj <c_(_dot_)_zakelj_(_at_)_ieee_(_dot_)_org>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 14:43:56 -0400

I'm curious... Did I just miss the email, or is there some reason why using the limit, optimization, and timeout runtime options isn't a reasonable thing to try with this problem?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pf firewall loses connectivity at 50,000 state table entries (thread separated)
  - From: Henning Brauer

Prev by Date: Re: -current tree stability (was: pf firewall loses connectivity at 50,000 state table entries)
Next by Date: Re: pf firewall loses connectivity at 50,000 state table entries (thread separated)
Previous by thread: document_all
Next by thread: Re: pf firewall loses connectivity at 50,000 state table entries (thread separated)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org