[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenBSD Printing: Where to begin? (Lex/IBM 4039 Parallel)
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org, miscbsd_(_at_)_sapl_(_dot_)_ab_(_dot_)_ca
- Subject: Re: OpenBSD Printing: Where to begin? (Lex/IBM 4039 Parallel)
- From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:11:48 -0701
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org, miscbsd_(_at_)_sapl_(_dot_)_ab_(_dot_)_ca
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 11:21:38AM +0200, Raymond Morsman wrote:
> Quoting dmartini_(_at_)_uni-hohenheim_(_dot_)_de:
>
> > Most UNIX applications put out PostScript, so no need for a
> > special driver. For network printing from Windows, you
> > need a PostScript driver on the windows machine and a means
> > of transferring printjobs to your OpenBSD box (Win2000 and
> > up has lpr, for NT it's an install option, or, like you plan
> > to do: use samba).
>
> Wouldn't it be just easier to install CUPS, install the right PPD file (from
> Foomatic) and install the Windows CUPS driver on the workstations that need to
> print to this server?
I use CUPS, but I wouldn't if I had a printer that understood
Postscript, or if I didn't need to constantly change resolutions,
or if I had users that could use 'lpr -P{lores-bw,hires-clr,...}'
etc.
CUPS is more complex than lpd.
--
<jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com>
Visit your host, monkey.org