[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: perl is broken (solution)



On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:31:24PM -0500, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:15:20PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> 
> > I run continual builds.  I have not seen the problem you have.  You have
> > broken something yourself.  Sorry, you are on your own.  Install or upgrade
> 
> That's what I was asking for, Theo. That's all you had to say. No need to get
> so upset.
> 
> > to a snapshot, it is *NEVER* not an option; come on what is so damned hard
> > about
> > 
> > 	cd /
> > 	tar xfpz comp34.tgz
> > 	tar xfpz base34.tgz
> > 
> > What is so DAMNED HARD ABOUT THAT?  Nothing.  You are exagerating the
> > problem, and one of your own (accidental) making.
> 
> Frankly, I'm concerned about overwriting something I may have built 
> specifically. I suppose I'd have the same problem building from source.
> If I don't have success building the source tree I just grabbed, I'll
> give that a shot. I really am curious what happened, however.

In an upgrade situation, isn't soemthing you built specifically, for the
previous version's environment, *exactly* the stuff you *would* want to
replace?

-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.                                  [TOFU := text oben,
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?        followup unten]



Visit your host, monkey.org