[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Re: fvwm version



On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:29:23AM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> w3m would be a nice alternative since it support a lot of those 
> features and has an unrestrictive license. But allas it doesn't work.

Maybe I'm feeling overly conservative, but I don't think w3m is a "nice
alternative" when it has _never_ worked on some OpenBSD architectures.
And pulling in boehm-gc just for a command-line web browser is a bit silly.

-- 
Anil Madhavapeddy                                   http://anil.recoil.org
University of Cambridge                            http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk