[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fvwm version
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: fvwm version
- From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 13:36:08 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 01:20:07PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> Scott Balneaves <sbalneav_(_at_)_legalaid_(_dot_)_mb_(_dot_)_ca> wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Gabe f wrote:
> > > I could always look at their various licenses...
> > 2 minutes worth of searching on sf.net revealed that Fluxbox, Blackbox
> > and Enlightenment are all BSD licensed. FWIW.
> *box is MIT licensed to be precise. But that doesn't matter I am
> afraid. Try telling them that less and lynx are GNU and can be replaced with
> the MIT-licensed w3m.
our less is not GPL.
lynx vs w3m has been discussed, I don't remember the outcome.
> When it comes to nicer software all of the sudden they are conservative
> and the license doesn't matter anymore. :)
no, you're so wrong.
http://2suck.net/hhwl.html - http://www.bsws.de/
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.