[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Old computer, large drive

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: Old computer, large drive
From: "T. Ribbrock" <emgaron_(_at_)_gmx_(_dot_)_net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:26:39 +0200
Cc: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+obsd_(_at_)_2003_(_dot_)_snew_(_dot_)_com>
Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org, Chuck Yerkes <chuck+obsd_(_at_)_2003_(_dot_)_snew_(_dot_)_com>

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:46:23PM -0700, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
> Yeah, you'd be using about the same amount of power and running at
> 2400Mhz rather than 166Mhz.  you'd have been screwed.

Oh, so *that's* why the faster systems need less cooling than the
older, slower ones... >:-)

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Thomas Ribbrock    http://www.ribbrock.org 
  "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"

References:
- Old computer, large drive
  - From: johnny
- Re: Old computer, large drive
  - From: Johnny Andersson
- Re: Old computer, large drive
  - From: Chuck Yerkes

Prev by Date: Re: sendmail resolution problem?
Next by Date: Re: Old computer, large hard drive
Previous by thread: Re: Old computer, large drive
Next by thread: Buffer overflow in ip_input.c?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org